Created with Highcharts 12.1.2
Chart context menu
COSMIN Scores - Criterion Validity
0 = Excellent, 1 = Good, 2 = Fair, 3 = Poor
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
0
1
2
3
Allen et al. 2011
Bellace et al. 2000
Blomkvist et al. 2016
Chkeir et al. 2012
Cutler et al. 2018
Draak et al. 2015
Hamilton et al. 1992
Kim et al. 2017
King et al. 1988
Martins et al. 2015
Mathiowetz et al. 2000
Muhldorfer-fodor et al. 2014
Shechtman et al. 2000
Silva et al. 2015
Svantesson et al. 2009
Ugurlu et al. 2013
Vermeulen et al. 2015
Wichelhaus et al. 2018
Was the % of missing items given?
Was there a description of how missing items were
handled?
Was the sample size included in the analysis
adequate?
Can the criterion used be considered as a reasonable
gold standard?
Were there any important flaws in the design or
methods of the study?
Were correlations, or the area under the ROC
calculated?
Highcharts.com